Why Aren’t We Transformed Yet?

There was a post on Internet Monk the other day on “The Evangelical Myth of Transformation”.

Articles like this have a tendency to annoy me for many reasons.

I guess I would be considered somewhat of an evangelical, so I am a bit defensive when I perceive an attack against something I hold to be true. I can understand why the people at IM are put off of the evangelical movement. The evangelicals were basically started when people were moving past the need for liturgy and wanting to experience God on a more personal level. Churches popped up everywhere supporting these Christians who were searching for more. As with any quick growth movement, leaders appeared who did not have a solid biblical background. Accusations have been made that the evangelicals are more interested in the pursuit of experiencing God over being grounded in religious tradition and biblical truths. I will agree with this in part. I have seen many evangelical churches were the people are more interested in trying to feel good about themselves than pursuing God. I have also seen many liturgy churches where the people are more interested in holding to religious tradition rather than pursuing God. I do not think either side is 100% correct in their views.

Transformation can be a buzz word that churches use to draw people in. People are unhappy and wanting a change. They want a new life. They want to be transformed into something else. I whole heartedly believe in the transformation process and that it is possible today, but it is not just a changing of thinking or actions. The transformation is the old person dying and the new person living. Reading Watchman Nee helped in my understanding of this process.

One problem we have as Christians, is our thinking that salvation is done on an individual level. We ask Jesus into our heart and He makes us a new creation. When we are saved, we are baptized into Jesus. All that God did was done in Jesus and the only way we are transformed and made new is by being in Jesus. The individual that we were died and we live in Jesus only. If we abide in Jesus, we are transformed. If we try to remain our individual self, we are not transformed. This is why the church is not seeing people’s lives transformed.

Can transformation be immediate or even a quick process? Sure. If the person can fully let go of the old person and operate wholly within Jesus, their life will resemble that of Jesus. The problem is we all struggle with the process of reckoning ourselves dead. We act out of old behaviors and instincts and the dead individual is seen rather than Jesus. We are not fully submitting to Jesus as Lord but rather struggle to keep the individual alive.

So I can see why people doubt the validity of transformation. If you do not see the process then it must not be real, right? It must be some hype to make people feel good rather than an actuality. That is the same argument atheist make about God and Christianity though.

One day they will understand the process and realized that they two have been transformed by Christ. I am just sad they have to struggle trying to live as the old person instead of working to reckon themselves unto the new creation in Christ.


Filed under Bible, Christianity, Religion

3 responses to “Why Aren’t We Transformed Yet?

  1. //The evangelicals were basically started when people were moving past the need for liturgy and wanting to experience God on a more personal level. Churches popped up everywhere supporting these Christians who were searching for more.//

    If that’s how we define and evangelical then I will renounce the label. I consider myself evangelical, but not seeker friend. I’m not even all that friendly in general, most days. Besides, what is the more? More than what? So much vagueness, so little time. sigh. … actually I liked what you had to say as the post progressed. I hope you’re not advocating collective salvation – I don’t think that’s the alternative to go after. But pursuit of individuality when we have supposedly died to self is likewise a contradiction, to say the least. Interesting thoughts…

  2. I don’t like that definition of evangelical either. The meaning keeps changing depends on who uses it. Martin Luther originally used it to denote the difference between Protestants and Roman Catholics. It changed again to show a difference between fundamentalist and more moderate Christians. It seems to be used as a derogatory term lately, depending on who is using it.

    For me, I hold to the following traits to define an evangelical:
    1 The need for personal conversion (or being “born again”)
    2 Actively expressing and sharing the gospel
    3 A high regard for biblical authority, especially biblical inerrancy
    4 An emphasis on teachings that proclaim the death and resurrection of Jesus.

    No collective salvation for me. A person’s salvation is based upon their acceptance of Jesus as Lord and Savior and nothing else.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s