Gay By Association

I have been accused of being either gay or desiring to have sex with men simply because I told a Christian that she should not condemn all homosexuals for not speaking out against Gay Pride parades.

Xander, you sound young. You haven’t thought through your ideas yet. Morality, by definition, is NOT every changing. The church has nothing to do with my article. I do blame heterosexuals when they show blatant immorality- I am AGAINST porn of any kind. I condemn it. You are willfully ignoring my comments because they don’t fit in with what you WISH to be true. The Bible says it is wrong. Note the following passages (these are only a few). It is very clearly stated. But I don’t think that will satisfy you. I believe you are either gay or considering engaging in homosexuality and so WISH God’s opinion to be different. But he has spoken and if you are considering acting upon your thoughts or if you are currently engaged in homosexual behavior, you need to stop. The lifestyle of homosexual men is one of complete abandon & sin- faithfulness to one partner is almost completely unknown in this population. Men are more attracted to the idea of unlimited sex than to actual homosexuality. It is this promiscuity you see in these photos. This is what I condemn. Sex with women is more difficult, more limited and requires a much deeper emotional & personal connection- something many men fear. Why? Because rejection is such a large possibility. There is no such rejection in the male homosexual arena. Anything goes and anyone goes. And so, they follow the urges of their bodies, get fleeting satisfaction- but become completely lost, angry & rebellious against God. It is not a good road- it leads only to destruction.

Xander, I can’t argue this with you anymore. You have my opinion. I hope you take my advice- it is well meant. You seem like a nice person.

Leviticus 18:22 – You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.

Leviticus 20:13 – If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them
Romans 1:26-27 – For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.

I Corinthians 6:9(NIV) – Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God
I Timothy 1:8-11 (NASB) – “But we know that the Law is good, if one uses it lawfully, realizing the fact that law is not made for a righteous person, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound teaching, according to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, with which I have been entrusted.”

Jude 1:6-7 (NASB) – And angels who did not keep their own domain, but abandoned their proper abode, He has kept in eternal bonds under darkness for the judgment of the great day, just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh, are exhibited as an example in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire.

I don’t see a ‘pulling back’ of what you think of as ‘name calling’. These ‘labels’ simply define the truth.
Unless you are saying that the prophets themselves were not expressing themselves in a way that ‘the fruit of the Holy Spirit is living in {their} hyearts, consciences, and proverbial mouths.”

How bizarre is it that you would want to blame an entire demographic for not speaking out against the actions of a few? Why not condemn heterosexuals as well since they all do not speak out against these parades as well?

Anti-gay Muslim cries bias

It amazes me how much the world is changing, yet very few people are talking about it. Why doesn’t stuff like this get more coverage in the media?

Muslim sues NYPD for refusing to hire him after he said homosexuals should be locked up

Remember: wherever Islamic law and practice and American law and practice conflict, it is American law and practice that has to give way. The NYPD probably wouldn’t hire anyone who said that he thought that homosexuals should be imprisoned; after all, there are a lot of gays in New York City, and a policeman who isn’t going to treat all people fairly is not much of a policeman. But no such considerations matter when it comes to Islam.

“Anti-gay Muslim cries bias,” by Helen Freund and Laura Italiano in the New York Post, June 12 (thanks to Ron):

The NYPD wouldn’t hire him — because he is anti-gay, a Police Academy reject complains in a startling new discrimination lawsuit.
The would-be cop from Brooklyn — identified only as “Farhan Doe” — is a Muslim-American who believes homosexuality is a sin as a matter of religious principal [sic], according to the suit.

Doe deserves to be in the NYPD, despite checking the “yes” box next to the question, “Do you believe that homosexuals should be locked up,” in 2009, when he applied, said his lawyer, Jerold Levine.

When Doe — who works as an auxiliary cop in Brooklyn — applied to the Police Academy the next year, he’d softened his views, still believing homosexuality is a sin, but no longer believing gays should be arrested, Levine said.

“They pro forma denied him again — saying he couldn’t possibly be a police officer,” the lawyer said. “The First Amendment is very clear, saying that you can’t discriminate against someone because they have a view you do not like,” he said….

Indeed, but doesn’t that principle apply also to “Farhan Doe,” if he were hired as a policeman and had to deal with gays?